Death of a Cyclist – Ichhpal Bharma

 

Some cases are pure tragedy for all concerned. As anyone who has ever driven a car knows, it is easy to come within a hairsbreadth of an accident. An example of what can happen is given by the case of Ichhpal Bharma, who was sentenced on 18th January to a £35 fine (as well as costs) and received 3 points on his licence for his role in an accident last June that lead to the death of Tom Ridgeway.

Mr Bharma pleaded guilty and the details are not as clear as they would be after a trial. Given that the sentence was passed by the Magistrates’ Court, it is harder to get the details.

What we do know is that Mr Bharma, a licensed taxi driver, was driving along a road in Birmingham. There was a collision with Mr Ridgeway (who was on his bike) which lead to him being flung on to the bonnet of Mr Bharma’s car which crashed shortly after.

Whilst this lead to Mr Ridgeway’s death, it was apparently not possible to say how the accident occurred, or what the cause of Mr Ridgeway’s death was. As a consequence, Mr Bharma was charged only with careless driving (contrary to s3 Road Traffic Act 1988).

Someone drives carelessly if their driving is without ‘due care or attention’ (ie, their driving falls below what would be expected of a competent and careful driver, for example, overtaking on the inside), or without reasonable consideration for other road users (for example, driving with undipped headlights).

This is a summary only offence, and one that is non-imprisonable (the maximum sentence is disqualification and a Level 5 fine). There are Magistrates’ Court sentencing guidelines that the Court would have considered (p117). Given the fine and the points imposed, it would seem that is was categorised as the least serious form of offending (momentary lapse of concentration or misjudgment).

The fact that someone dies is a feature that would normally aggravate the sentence. There is a separate (and more serious – maximum penalty 5 years) offence of causing death by careless driving. This requires proof of the offence of careless driving (present in this case as there was a guilty plea) and that the driving caused the death. This could not be charged in this case as it could not be established that the careless driving was the cause of death.

On the face of it, a fine and points on the licence is a derisory penalty when someone died. Hopefully, the above goes some way to explaining how the sentence was arrived at. Here, it seems that the case was about as close as you can get to an accident, rather than an incident that should attract criminal liability. Mr Bharma did not intend the death, he was not reckless in relation to the death and was probably guilt-ridden by the death. This is a good example of the difficult issues that the criminal law can throw up. It seems that the Court balanced the interests correctly.

There will be an inquest later this year where fuller details of the incident may come out.

 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in In the news on by .

About Dan Bunting

I'm a lawyer who works for myself. Legal geek, maths freak, general dullard and jack of all trades. Here’s a few views on law and occasional musings on life. Usual caveats about not relying on anything I say etc applies.

4 thoughts on “Death of a Cyclist – Ichhpal Bharma

  1. Andrew

    As a JP (lay, although I practice as a civil lawyer) I recognise the most difficult sort of charging and sentencing decision which the CPS and we respectively face.

    Reply
  2. Gill Cooper

    This is a very disturbing case for anyone that walks or cycles. Contrast with this case http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-21034918 where the judge pointed out the responsibility that drivers must have to look out for more vulnerable road users.

    I found the Cycling Silk’s blog on Bhamra very interesting http://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/update-from-court-cps-v-bhamra.html?m=1 and feel that the CPS charging decision was pathetic.

    Reply
  3. Dan Bunting Post author

    Thanks for that Gill. It’s useful to have some more details about the case. I can understand that people are surprised that the more serious charge was not laid, especially given the normally somewhat cavalier attitude of the CPS.

    Ultimately, I imagine that the facts will be a lot more clear after the inquest. Although Mr Bharma would not be able to be prosecuted for causing death by careless driving however the evidence comes out..

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s