R v Huhne and Pryce – What is the likely sentence?

R v Huhne and Pryce – Sentencing hearing

Southwark Crown Court

11 February 2013, 2pm

Mr Justice Sweeney

Chris Huhne and Vicky Pryce were warned to be under no illusion as to the sentence they would likely receive when sentenced. This means they are going to receive custodial sentences.

The Court of Appeal have said that this offence should always lead to a custodial sentence ‘in all but the most exceptional circumstances’.

But how long? Well let’s first look at Huhne. He pleaded guilty, on the day of trial. Here is our explanation of the usual way in which credit for a guilty plea is calculated.

Based on that, one may think he is entitled to no more than 10%. However, based on his abuse of process applications (for an explanation, see here) it may be that Huhne is entitled to more. It will not have been Chris Huhne’s decision to have the abuse of process applications immediately before the trial and so it could be argued that his late plea is not a consequence of his persistent denials of guilt. Consequently, it may be said on his behalf that he would have pleaded guilty earlier, had the abuse applications been heard sooner. If Mr Kelsey-Fry is feeling cheeky, he may even argue that Huhne had the right to make the abuse applications and upon their determination (against him) pleaded at the first reasonable opportunity. Such an argument is unlikely to succeed. He may receive 20% credit – but it is difficult to predict.

Turning to Vicky Pryce, she did not plead guilty and so she receives no such credit. She was obviously less culpable than Huhne, who instigated the offence, and gained nothing from the offence.

Perhaps Huhne and Pryce could end up with the same sentence – the 20% credit for plea wiping out the uplift for being the driving force behind the offence.

The persistent denials have certainly done them no favours.

My personal view is that 9 months would be appropriate, however, on the authorities, it may be that 6 months is more in keeping with sentencing practice.

Of course, there is much to be said in mitigation – how much both of them have lost, personally and professionally, and so the range would appear to be from 4 months (any shorter would not mark the seriousness of the offence) to 16 months (any longer would certainly trouble the Court of Appeal.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “R v Huhne and Pryce – What is the likely sentence?

  1. Pingback: R v Huhne and Pryce – The key information | UK Criminal Law Blog

  2. Andrew

    It must be relevant that she did not plead and tried to blame her co-defendant – whose role would have appeared worse (and his sentence possibly been longer) had she succeeded. In short, she tried to save her skin at his expense.

    Nor does it follow that she gained nothing. They were still a couple and him being without a licence would (and indeed a few months later did) impact on her. There is a reading of the history in which she agrees with him nominating her as the driver and takes the points willingly. She denies it, but she would, wouldn’t she?

    You will see that I think she should get slightly longer. It would certainly not be unfair if she did.

    Well, we will know tomorrow.

    It’s a sad business for them both, however much they deserve it and each other. To think of leaving home, not knowing when you’ll be back, taking care – unlike the usual procedure – that you have not got your house keys on you, and knowing that you are headed for the misery which is the English prison system (not that there are not many worse) – what an experience for these two people, one of whom was born to comfort and privilege and one of whom has certainly got used to it. Hubris, hubris, hubris.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s