Gazza fined for Common Assault

Paul Gascoigne was sentenced on 5th August 2013 at Stevenage Magistrates’ Court to a fine of £1,000 for an offence of Common Assault (punching a railway security guard) and being Drunk and Disorderly.

On 4th July this year he was on a train back to London from Newcastle when he alighted at Stevenage in a highly intoxicated state. A security guard, Jack Sherington, approached him to offer him some help (as he appeared to be staggering towards the tracks. With some colleagues, he put Mr Gascoigne into a wheelchair, at which point the ex-football star became aggressive, grabbing Mr Sherington around the neck for a few seconds.

Mr Gascoigne also had to pay £100 compensation to Mr Sherington. There would also have been a victim surcharge in the same amount, as well as (possibly) costs.

So, did Gazza get an easy ride due to his celebrity status, or did he get a pass from a footballer-friendly bench? The starting point is the Sentencing Guidelines (page 24 for Common Assault). Given that there was no injury, it is a ‘lesser harm’ case. As is often the case, it is hard to say what the ‘culpability’ is, but would appear to be ‘lower culpability’ (due to the impromptu nature of the attack.

This would give a starting point of a fine (which was, of course, what was imposed). To that extent, it seems that Mr Gascoigne was treated as a ‘normal’ member of the public (as, of course, he should be).

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in In the news on by .

About Dan Bunting

I'm a lawyer who works for myself. Legal geek, maths freak, general dullard and jack of all trades. Here’s a few views on law and occasional musings on life. Usual caveats about not relying on anything I say etc applies.

One thought on “Gazza fined for Common Assault

  1. duncanheenanan

    Gazza appears to have relapsed into alcoholism again. Most recidivist alcoholics coming before the bench are put on compulsory courses to try to address their alcohol problem, and their previous record in this respect is taken in to account. The bench may have taken the view that he is a hopeless case, but simply fining him does nothing to stop him doing it again, and some form of rehabilitation would have been better, and normal for a normal alcoholic.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s