Constance Briscoe guilty of perverting the course of justice



In the Spring of 2003 Chris Huhne persuaded his then wife, Vicky Pryce, to take his speeding points. This seemingly minor act would come back to haunt them ten years later. It’s effect went further than them and one of the major casualties was Constance Briscoe.

On 1 May 2014 she was convicted of three count of perverting the course of justice.

This is a very quick look just after the verdict is announced. We will look at this in more detail when the  dust has settled and Ms Briscoe is sentenced.


Ms Briscoe was originally charged with two offences of Perverting the Course of Justice :

Charge 1

Between 16 May 2011 and 6 October 2012 you with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did a series of acts which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice, in that you provided the police with two statements which were inaccurate.

Charge 2

On 6 October 2012 you with intent to pervert the course of public justice, did an act which had a tendency to pervert the course of public justice, in that you produced a copy of your witness statement that had been altered and maintained that it was the correct version of that statement.

A third charge was added during the proceedings that related to the falsification of a document.

In 2011 when the police were investigating the Huhne case they took two witness statements from Ms Briscoe (a neighbour). In this she indicated that she ‘held them in the same regard’ and that she had not had any contact ‘whatsoever’ with the press. This was incorrect in that Ms Briscoe was a confidant of Ms Pryce and was discussing matters with the Mail on Sunday.

When “Ms Briscoe was later interviewed by police following her arrest, she pointed out an alteration in her statement, claiming it changed the meaning, the court was told”.

This triggered the third allegation. A copy of the statement was given to an expert witness instructed by Ms Briscoe’s legal team and it was alleged that the wrong one was deliberately handed to the expert in order to get favourable evidence.

The Prosecutor was quoted as saying (when she opened the case to the jury) “the criminal offences she is charged with all arise … out of what the prosecution say is Ms Briscoe acting deliberately: a) to hide what she was really up to when the police asked her about it; b) giving the police misleading information and; c) later on trying to manipulate both the police and the court during an investigation into Ms Briscoe’s own actions“”

Ms Briscoe accepted being an intermediary between Ms Pryce and the Mail on Sunday, but stated that the relevant part of the statement had been added by the Police by the mistake.

Why is she called a ‘top Judge’?

This appears to be an unwritten rule of journalism. Any barrister must be reported in the press as a ‘top brief/barrister/lawyer’, and most often a QC (even if they’re not). For the same reason, there’s no such thing as a mere ‘judge’, everyone is a top judge. It’s just one of those things – I don’t make the rules.


Perverting the course of justice almost always results in a custodial sentence (see the factsheet above). Vicky Pryce got 8 months and this would appear to be, on the fact of it, far more serious than that. The fact that Ms Briscoe is a lawyer will not help her (if anything, it aggravates it).

Barring some exceptional circumstance, it would seem quite clear that the result will be a custodial sentence. Based on the seriousness of the offences, we would expect the court to start at somewhere in the region of 18 months, before considering any mitigation.

She will be sentenced on Friday 2 May 2014.

What happens next for her?

She will be sentenced shortly and will not doubt be considering an appeal. We’ll have a look at the case in more detail shortly. Her legal career is finished following this conviction.

There are instances of Judges being found guilty of criminal offences (common assault as an example and, more recently, failing to control a dog), but this is in a different league. It is also, as far as we know, the first time a Judge in England and Wales has been convicted of Perverting the Course of Justice.


9 thoughts on “Constance Briscoe guilty of perverting the course of justice

  1. Pingback: Thomas Blazquez, former CPS clerk, jailed for murder | UK Criminal Law Blog

  2. polruan

    The consequences of Chris Huhne’s cowardice and his belief (like so many politicians) that he was above the law ripple on, and have now cost Constance Briscoe very dear. She will lose virtually everything. Her position as a part-time judge, her legal career (as an officer of the court, and a judge to boot, she could have been under no delusions about the import of her actions), & her whole professional livelihood, except perhaps her literary career. She is a fine writer, and had an interesting story of triumph over adversity to tell.

    She will have an even more interesting one to relate after she has served her sentence, no doubt, and I for one will most certainly buy a copy of whatever book is born of her experiences.

    The human cost of Chris Huhne’s actions was already considerable; it is even greater now.

    1. Liberte, Egalitie, Sororite

      One thing I’m curious about even if she can’t practise as a lawyer per se. Could she work in a legal capacity such as advice centre etc plus what about if I decided I was going to court in a civil or criminal matter asked her to represent me as a friend rather than lawyer would this be allowed? I mean presumably she’s not banned from court completely. Does anyone know for definite?

      1. polruan

        As I read the rules, if a barrister is disbarred or ‘struck off’ following a Bar Standards Board hearing, their practising certificate is withdrawn and they can no longer represent anyone in court. They can act as a McKenzie friend (for which no legal qualifications are required). Specific rules apply to advice centre work, and a disbarred barrister could not provide legal advice at a law centre, for example.

  3. Pingback: Constance Briscoe Sentenced – 16 months in prison | UK Criminal Law Blog

  4. Up Rise and Shine London

    Very saddened to read about Constance. Another educated, intelligent and high performance woman hits the dust because Chris Huhne is a liar.

    What good is prison going to do to her? A horrible long community service sentence would have had a better effect and cost the taxpayers less money.

  5. Andrew

    Hang your head in shame over the superfluous apostrophe in “It’s effect”!

    She is not a casualty of Huhne’s dishonesty; she is a casualty of her own dishonesty. You can’t hang this on Chris.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s